This project shows the difference between a literal translation and a properly localized CV.

The French version includes personal details standard in France (date of birth, marital status). In English, I removed these — including such details is unusual in the US/UK/Canada and can work against the candidate.

I also restructured the summary to match how English-speaking recruiters scan CVs: results first, not a general self-description.

This is the kind of adaptation I apply to every translation: not just converting words, but making the document work the way it's expected to in the target culture.

This service agreement shows how legal and business terminology needs careful handling in translation — not word-for-word substitution.

French legal concepts like "SAS" (a company structure) or "mise en demeure" (a formal legal notice before litigation) don't have exact English equivalents. I either use the recognized English legal term or keep the French term with a brief clarification, so the document stays accurate and enforceable in both languages.

This kind of precision matters for contracts, NDAs, and business agreements — a small mistranslation can create real legal ambiguity.